Home/Case Law/in Re Myron D. Lester
Regular Panel Decision DecisionOriginal Proceeding

in Re Myron D. Lester

Filed: May 15, 2008
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
09-08-086 CV

CompFox AI Summary

Myron D. Lester, the relator, challenged a trial court's decision to deny his motion to transfer a child custody suit from Jefferson County to Fort Bend County. Lester argued that Essene Bell's motion to modify a Maryland divorce decree, which incorporated but did not merge a custody agreement, constituted an 'original proceeding' under the Texas Family Code, necessitating a transfer. The Court of Appeals, Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont, determined that the Maryland decree's provision for custody, even through an unmerged agreement, qualified as a 'child custody determination.' Therefore, Bell's suit was a 'modification proceeding,' and Lester failed to meet the statutory requirement of proving the child resided in Fort Bend County for six months or longer for a mandatory transfer. Consequently, the appellate court denied Lester's petition for mandamus relief.

in Re Myron D. Lester is a workers' compensation case decided in Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont). This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont).

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Myron D. Lester, the relator, challenged a trial court's decision to deny his motion to transfer a child custody suit from Jefferson County to Fort Bend County. Lester argued that Essene Bell's motion to modify a Maryland divorce decree, which incorporated but did not merge a custody agreement, constituted an 'original proceeding' under the Texas Family Code, necessitating a transfer. The Court of Appeals, Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont, determined that the Maryland decree's provision for custody, even through an unmerged agreement, qualified as a 'child custody determination.' Therefore, Bell's suit was a 'modification proceeding,' and Lester failed to meet the statutory requirement of proving the child resided in Fort Bend County for six months or longer for a mandatory transfer. Consequently, the appellate court denied Lester's petition for mandamus relief.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

in Re Myron D. Lester workers compensation case in Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont). Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

in Re Myron D. Lester case law summary from Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont). Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

in Re Myron D. Lester Case Analysis

in Re Myron D. Lester is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont). This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.