Home/Case Law/IMELDA CANALES vs. KATHYOUN SABETAIN, M.D., STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANIES
Regular DecisionOrder Dismissing Petition for Reconsideration and Denying Removal

IMELDA CANALES vs. KATHYOUN SABETAIN, M.D., STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANIES

Filed: May 17, 2011
San Francisco
ADJ1476075 (BAK 0146452)

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the Petition for Reconsideration because it was filed against an interlocutory order, not a final decision, and therefore not subject to reconsideration under Labor Code section 5900. The Board also denied the petition for removal, finding no showing of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm as required by regulation and case law. The Board further admonished the petitioner for omissions and misstatements in their petition's statement of facts. Consequently, the petition was dismissed and removal was denied.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the Petition for Reconsideration because it was filed against an interlocutory order, not a final decision, and therefore not subject to reconsideration under Labor Code section 5900. The Board also denied the petition for removal, finding no showing of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm as required by regulation and case law. The Board further admonished the petitioner for omissions and misstatements in their petition's statement of facts. Consequently, the petition was dismissed and removal was denied.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.