Home/Case Law/IGNACIO ROA vs. ROHRER BROTHERS/ GENERAL PRODUCE, FREMONT COMPENSATION INSURANCE COMPANY, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, SEDGWICK, XL SPECIALTY/ BROADSPIRE, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND
Regular DecisionClerical Error Correction

IGNACIO ROA vs. ROHRER BROTHERS/ GENERAL PRODUCE, FREMONT COMPENSATION INSURANCE COMPANY, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, SEDGWICK, XL SPECIALTY/ BROADSPIRE, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

Filed: Mar 04, 2016
Stockton
ADJ3023725 (STK 0186210), ADJ6853419

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves a clerical error in the date of service for a Workers' Compensation Appeals Board decision. The Board's Opinion and Order Denying Petition for Reconsideration mistakenly listed the service date as March 3, 2016. The Appeals Board issued an order to correct this error, amending the service date to March 4, 2016. This correction was made without granting reconsideration, as such clerical errors can be rectified at any time.

IGNACIO ROA vs. ROHRER BROTHERS/ GENERAL PRODUCE, FREMONT COMPENSATION INSURANCE COMPANY, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, SEDGWICK, XL SPECIALTY/ BROADSPIRE, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in Stockton. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Stockton.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves a clerical error in the date of service for a Workers' Compensation Appeals Board decision. The Board's Opinion and Order Denying Petition for Reconsideration mistakenly listed the service date as March 3, 2016. The Appeals Board issued an order to correct this error, amending the service date to March 4, 2016. This correction was made without granting reconsideration, as such clerical errors can be rectified at any time.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

IGNACIO ROA vs. ROHRER BROTHERS/ GENERAL PRODUCE, FREMONT COMPENSATION INSURANCE COMPANY, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, SEDGWICK, XL SPECIALTY/ BROADSPIRE, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND workers compensation case in Stockton. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

IGNACIO ROA vs. ROHRER BROTHERS/ GENERAL PRODUCE, FREMONT COMPENSATION INSURANCE COMPANY, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, SEDGWICK, XL SPECIALTY/ BROADSPIRE, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND case law summary from Stockton. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

IGNACIO ROA vs. ROHRER BROTHERS/ GENERAL PRODUCE, FREMONT COMPENSATION INSURANCE COMPANY, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, SEDGWICK, XL SPECIALTY/ BROADSPIRE, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND Case Analysis

IGNACIO ROA vs. ROHRER BROTHERS/ GENERAL PRODUCE, FREMONT COMPENSATION INSURANCE COMPANY, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, SEDGWICK, XL SPECIALTY/ BROADSPIRE, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Stockton. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.