Home/Case Law/HOWARD C. RICHARDS vs. CAST & CREW; ENTERTAINMENT PARTNERS by ZURICH NORTH AMERICA, Permissibly Self-Insured, by CNA CLAIMS PLUS
Regular DecisionReconsideration

HOWARD C. RICHARDS vs. CAST & CREW; ENTERTAINMENT PARTNERS by ZURICH NORTH AMERICA, Permissibly Self-Insured, by CNA CLAIMS PLUS

Filed: Mar 13, 2009
Oakland
ADJ4560326 (OAK 0306464) ADJ3269047 (OAK 0314851)

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the applicant's petition for reconsideration, treating a prior petition to set aside a Compromise and Release as timely. The applicant claimed the settlement was agreed to under duress and alleged fraud by the insurance company. The Board rescinded the prior order approving the settlement and returned the case to the trial level for further proceedings on the adequacy of the settlement and fraud claims. The judge will reinstate the approval if the settlement is found adequate and no fraud is proven.

HOWARD C. RICHARDS vs. CAST & CREW; ENTERTAINMENT PARTNERS by ZURICH NORTH AMERICA, Permissibly Self-Insured, by CNA CLAIMS PLUS is a workers' compensation case decided in Oakland. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Oakland.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the applicant's petition for reconsideration, treating a prior petition to set aside a Compromise and Release as timely. The applicant claimed the settlement was agreed to under duress and alleged fraud by the insurance company. The Board rescinded the prior order approving the settlement and returned the case to the trial level for further proceedings on the adequacy of the settlement and fraud claims. The judge will reinstate the approval if the settlement is found adequate and no fraud is proven.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

HOWARD C. RICHARDS vs. CAST & CREW; ENTERTAINMENT PARTNERS by ZURICH NORTH AMERICA, Permissibly Self-Insured, by CNA CLAIMS PLUS workers compensation case in Oakland. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

HOWARD C. RICHARDS vs. CAST & CREW; ENTERTAINMENT PARTNERS by ZURICH NORTH AMERICA, Permissibly Self-Insured, by CNA CLAIMS PLUS case law summary from Oakland. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

HOWARD C. RICHARDS vs. CAST & CREW; ENTERTAINMENT PARTNERS by ZURICH NORTH AMERICA, Permissibly Self-Insured, by CNA CLAIMS PLUS Case Analysis

HOWARD C. RICHARDS vs. CAST & CREW; ENTERTAINMENT PARTNERS by ZURICH NORTH AMERICA, Permissibly Self-Insured, by CNA CLAIMS PLUS is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Oakland. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.