Home/Case Law/HORTENCIA JAMES vs. ADDUS HEALTHCARE, CNA CASUALTY OF CALIFORNIA
Regular DecisionReconsideration

HORTENCIA JAMES vs. ADDUS HEALTHCARE, CNA CASUALTY OF CALIFORNIA

Filed: Sep 05, 2008
San Francisco
ADJ2522273

CompFox AI Summary

Reconsideration granted; WCJ's denial of permanent disability for psychiatric injury reversed due to lack of apportionment; case remanded for further proceedings under Labor Code section 4663(c).

HORTENCIA JAMES vs. ADDUS HEALTHCARE, CNA CASUALTY OF CALIFORNIA is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Reconsideration granted; WCJ's denial of permanent disability for psychiatric injury reversed due to lack of apportionment; case remanded for further proceedings under Labor Code section 4663(c).

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

HORTENCIA JAMES vs. ADDUS HEALTHCARE, CNA CASUALTY OF CALIFORNIA workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

HORTENCIA JAMES vs. ADDUS HEALTHCARE, CNA CASUALTY OF CALIFORNIA case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

HORTENCIA JAMES vs. ADDUS HEALTHCARE, CNA CASUALTY OF CALIFORNIA Case Analysis

HORTENCIA JAMES vs. ADDUS HEALTHCARE, CNA CASUALTY OF CALIFORNIA is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.