Home/Case Law/HOLLIE BAILEY vs. MAINHEIM CALIFORNIA, BROADSPIRE, A CRAWFORD COMPANY
Regular DecisionReconsideration

HOLLIE BAILEY vs. MAINHEIM CALIFORNIA, BROADSPIRE, A CRAWFORD COMPANY

Filed: Aug 29, 2016
Marina Del Rey
ADJ7728790

CompFox AI Summary

In Bailey v. Mainheim California, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration as untimely. The petition was filed on August 29, 2016, exceeding the 25-day jurisdictional deadline from the WCJ's August 1, 2016 decision. The WCAB clarified that filing means actual receipt by the Board, not just mailing. Therefore, the Board lacked authority to consider the untimely petition.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

In Bailey v. Mainheim California, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration as untimely. The petition was filed on August 29, 2016, exceeding the 25-day jurisdictional deadline from the WCJ's August 1, 2016 decision. The WCAB clarified that filing means actual receipt by the Board, not just mailing. Therefore, the Board lacked authority to consider the untimely petition.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

HOLLIE BAILEY vs. MAINHEIM CALIFORNIA, BROADSPIRE, A CRAWFORD COMPANY (2016) – Marina Del Rey | CompFox