Home/Case Law/Hill v. Country Club Acres, Inc.
Regular Panel Decision DecisionAppeal Decision

Hill v. Country Club Acres, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
MISSING

CompFox AI Summary

Plaintiff, the sole member of 43 Round Lake, LLC, sustained injuries from a fall while removing a ceiling fan from a restaurant premises owned by the defendant. The incident occurred as the restaurant was vacating due to the defendant's planned demolition of the strip mall. Plaintiff commenced an action seeking damages under Labor Law §§ 200, 240, and 241 (6). The Supreme Court granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment, dismissing the complaint, and denied the plaintiff's cross-motion for partial summary judgment. The appellate court affirmed the Supreme Court's decision, concluding that the plaintiff was not 'hired' by anyone and was not acting as an employee of either the defendant or 43 Round Lake, LLC at the time of the injury, thereby falling outside the protective scope of the Labor Law statutes.

Hill v. Country Club Acres, Inc. is a workers' compensation case decided in Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Plaintiff, the sole member of 43 Round Lake, LLC, sustained injuries from a fall while removing a ceiling fan from a restaurant premises owned by the defendant. The incident occurred as the restaurant was vacating due to the defendant's planned demolition of the strip mall. Plaintiff commenced an action seeking damages under Labor Law §§ 200, 240, and 241 (6). The Supreme Court granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment, dismissing the complaint, and denied the plaintiff's cross-motion for partial summary judgment. The appellate court affirmed the Supreme Court's decision, concluding that the plaintiff was not 'hired' by anyone and was not acting as an employee of either the defendant or 43 Round Lake, LLC at the time of the injury, thereby falling outside the protective scope of the Labor Law statutes.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Hill v. Country Club Acres, Inc. workers compensation case in Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Hill v. Country Club Acres, Inc. case law summary from Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Hill v. Country Club Acres, Inc. Case Analysis

Hill v. Country Club Acres, Inc. is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.