Home/Case Law/HILDA BONILLA vs. CAMEO CLEANERS, TOWER SELECT INSURANCE COMPANY
Regular DecisionReconsideration

HILDA BONILLA vs. CAMEO CLEANERS, TOWER SELECT INSURANCE COMPANY

Filed: Feb 28, 2011
San Francisco
ADJ7138792

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration to reverse a prior finding of industrial psychiatric injury. The WCAB found the applicant's psychiatric injury claim barred by Labor Code section 3208.3(d) because she was employed for less than six months. The Board determined the incident, where an ironing press lowered on the applicant's hand, was not a "sudden and extraordinary employment condition" as required to overcome the six-month rule. This conclusion was based on evidence that burns at a dry cleaner are common and that the machine operated with a single button, increasing the risk of such an injury.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration to reverse a prior finding of industrial psychiatric injury. The WCAB found the applicant's psychiatric injury claim barred by Labor Code section 3208.3(d) because she was employed for less than six months. The Board determined the incident, where an ironing press lowered on the applicant's hand, was not a "sudden and extraordinary employment condition" as required to overcome the six-month rule. This conclusion was based on evidence that burns at a dry cleaner are common and that the machine operated with a single button, increasing the risk of such an injury.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

HILDA BONILLA vs. CAMEO CLEANERS, TOWER SELECT INSURANCE COMPANY (2011) – San Francisco | CompFox