Home/Case Law/Herman Dennler vs. TIMEC CO., INC., ST. PAUL TRAVELERS, OPEN WAVES SYSTEMS, LUMBERMAN'S MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, BROADSPIRE
Regular DecisionReconsideration

Herman Dennler vs. TIMEC CO., INC., ST. PAUL TRAVELERS, OPEN WAVES SYSTEMS, LUMBERMAN'S MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, BROADSPIRE

Filed: Jan 25, 2010
San Francisco
ADJ3262542 (GRO 27301) ADJ437058 (GRO 28637)

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied St. Paul Travelers' petition for reconsideration regarding a Findings and Award. The WCJ found the applicant needed surgery as recommended by Dr. Khoo and that Travelers unreasonably delayed its authorization. The Board affirmed the WCJ's findings, citing Labor Code § 4062(b) which mandates employer authorization of surgery when a second opinion evaluator recommends it. Travelers' failure to authorize the recommended revision surgery, despite a second opinion report, constituted an unreasonable delay warranting increased compensation and attorney fees.

Herman Dennler vs. TIMEC CO., INC., ST. PAUL TRAVELERS, OPEN WAVES SYSTEMS, LUMBERMAN'S MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, BROADSPIRE is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied St. Paul Travelers' petition for reconsideration regarding a Findings and Award. The WCJ found the applicant needed surgery as recommended by Dr. Khoo and that Travelers unreasonably delayed its authorization. The Board affirmed the WCJ's findings, citing Labor Code § 4062(b) which mandates employer authorization of surgery when a second opinion evaluator recommends it. Travelers' failure to authorize the recommended revision surgery, despite a second opinion report, constituted an unreasonable delay warranting increased compensation and attorney fees.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Herman Dennler vs. TIMEC CO., INC., ST. PAUL TRAVELERS, OPEN WAVES SYSTEMS, LUMBERMAN'S MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, BROADSPIRE workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Herman Dennler vs. TIMEC CO., INC., ST. PAUL TRAVELERS, OPEN WAVES SYSTEMS, LUMBERMAN'S MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, BROADSPIRE case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Herman Dennler vs. TIMEC CO., INC., ST. PAUL TRAVELERS, OPEN WAVES SYSTEMS, LUMBERMAN'S MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, BROADSPIRE Case Analysis

Herman Dennler vs. TIMEC CO., INC., ST. PAUL TRAVELERS, OPEN WAVES SYSTEMS, LUMBERMAN'S MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, BROADSPIRE is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.