Home/Case Law/Hemingway, James v. Nissan
Regular Panel Decision DecisionRegular Panel Decision

Hemingway, James v. Nissan

Filed: Jan 28, 2016
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
2015-05-0138

CompFox AI Summary

James Hemingway, an employee of Nissan North America, Inc., filed a Request for Expedited Hearing seeking medical and temporary disability benefits for a right wrist and hand condition. He reported the issue on October 26, 2014, and was seen by Dr. Gilbert Woodall, who diagnosed acute arthritis likely gout and not primarily work-related. Dissatisfied, Mr. Hemingway sought treatment from Dr. Kerri Woodberry, and Dr. John Witt performed nerve conduction studies consistent with bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome. Dr. Woodall later attributed the carpal tunnel syndrome to osteoarthritis, not work activities. The Court found that Mr. Hemingway did not provide sufficient medical evidence to overcome the statutory presumption of correctness for Dr. Woodall’s causation opinion, which stated the condition was not work-related. Consequently, the Court denied Mr. Hemingway's requests for medical and temporary disability benefits.

Hemingway, James v. Nissan is a workers' compensation case decided in Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

James Hemingway, an employee of Nissan North America, Inc., filed a Request for Expedited Hearing seeking medical and temporary disability benefits for a right wrist and hand condition. He reported the issue on October 26, 2014, and was seen by Dr. Gilbert Woodall, who diagnosed acute arthritis likely gout and not primarily work-related. Dissatisfied, Mr. Hemingway sought treatment from Dr. Kerri Woodberry, and Dr. John Witt performed nerve conduction studies consistent with bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome. Dr. Woodall later attributed the carpal tunnel syndrome to osteoarthritis, not work activities. The Court found that Mr. Hemingway did not provide sufficient medical evidence to overcome the statutory presumption of correctness for Dr. Woodall’s causation opinion, which stated the condition was not work-related. Consequently, the Court denied Mr. Hemingway's requests for medical and temporary disability benefits.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Hemingway, James v. Nissan workers compensation case in Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Hemingway, James v. Nissan case law summary from Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Hemingway, James v. Nissan Case Analysis

Hemingway, James v. Nissan is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.