Home/Case Law/HELEN BOUGH vs. DANA MANCHESTER, DMD, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND
Regular DecisionReconsideration

HELEN BOUGH vs. DANA MANCHESTER, DMD, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

Filed: Jun 18, 2015
Oxnard
ADJ4305719

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendants' petition for reconsideration in this case. The defendants argued the Workers' Compensation Judge erred in ordering the State Compensation Insurance Fund (SCIF) to reimburse the Employment Development Department (EDD). However, SCIF had prior knowledge of EDD's lien for benefits paid to the applicant but still proceeded to pay the full award. The Board found that EDD is entitled to reimbursement from SCIF and that the award does not constitute a double recovery for the applicant.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendants' petition for reconsideration in this case. The defendants argued the Workers' Compensation Judge erred in ordering the State Compensation Insurance Fund (SCIF) to reimburse the Employment Development Department (EDD). However, SCIF had prior knowledge of EDD's lien for benefits paid to the applicant but still proceeded to pay the full award. The Board found that EDD is entitled to reimbursement from SCIF and that the award does not constitute a double recovery for the applicant.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

HELEN BOUGH vs. DANA MANCHESTER, DMD, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND (2015) – Oxnard | CompFox