Home/Case Law/HECTOR CAMPOS vs. COCA-COLA ENTERPRISES, permissibly self-insured, administered by SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES
Regular DecisionReconsideration Decision

HECTOR CAMPOS vs. COCA-COLA ENTERPRISES, permissibly self-insured, administered by SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES

Filed: Jul 11, 2008
San Francisco
SAL 0112274, SAL 0115410

CompFox AI Summary

The Appeals Board affirmed the WCJ's award of 5% permanent disability for industrial injuries to the applicant's right upper extremity. The applicant's claim for a higher rating based on diminished future earning capacity (DFEC) was rejected because the vocational expert's methodology failed to rebut the presumptive validity of the 2005 Permanent Disability Rating Schedule (PDRS) and did not align with the AMA Guides or empirical data requirements of Labor Code section 4660. The Board found the WCJ's reliance on the PDRS and the treating physician's impairment ratings to be appropriate.

HECTOR CAMPOS vs. COCA-COLA ENTERPRISES, permissibly self-insured, administered by SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Appeals Board affirmed the WCJ's award of 5% permanent disability for industrial injuries to the applicant's right upper extremity. The applicant's claim for a higher rating based on diminished future earning capacity (DFEC) was rejected because the vocational expert's methodology failed to rebut the presumptive validity of the 2005 Permanent Disability Rating Schedule (PDRS) and did not align with the AMA Guides or empirical data requirements of Labor Code section 4660. The Board found the WCJ's reliance on the PDRS and the treating physician's impairment ratings to be appropriate.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

HECTOR CAMPOS vs. COCA-COLA ENTERPRISES, permissibly self-insured, administered by SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

HECTOR CAMPOS vs. COCA-COLA ENTERPRISES, permissibly self-insured, administered by SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

HECTOR CAMPOS vs. COCA-COLA ENTERPRISES, permissibly self-insured, administered by SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES Case Analysis

HECTOR CAMPOS vs. COCA-COLA ENTERPRISES, permissibly self-insured, administered by SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.