Home/Case Law/Hebert v. D/S Ove Skou
Regular Panel Decision DecisionRegular Panel Decision

Hebert v. D/S Ove Skou

District Court, E.D. Texas
MISSING

CompFox AI Summary

James B. Hebert, a longshoreman, was injured aboard the M/V JETTYE SKOU in Port Arthur, Texas, when a short hatch board gave way. He sued the vessel owner, D/S Ove Skou, and time charterer, United Fruit Company, alleging negligence and unseaworthiness. D/S Ove Skou impleaded Southern Stevedoring & Contracting Company and Port Arthur Shipping Corporation, seeking indemnity for their roles in handling the defective hatch board. The court found the vessel unseaworthy due to the short hatch board and found both stevedoring companies negligent in their duties. Hebert was also found 20% contributorily negligent. The court awarded Hebert $41,121.95 against D/S Ove Skou. D/S Ove Skou received 50% indemnity from the stevedoring companies, and United Fruit Company received indemnity for attorney's fees from the stevedoring companies.

Hebert v. D/S Ove Skou is a workers' compensation case decided in District Court, E.D. Texas. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in District Court, E.D. Texas.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

James B. Hebert, a longshoreman, was injured aboard the M/V JETTYE SKOU in Port Arthur, Texas, when a short hatch board gave way. He sued the vessel owner, D/S Ove Skou, and time charterer, United Fruit Company, alleging negligence and unseaworthiness. D/S Ove Skou impleaded Southern Stevedoring & Contracting Company and Port Arthur Shipping Corporation, seeking indemnity for their roles in handling the defective hatch board. The court found the vessel unseaworthy due to the short hatch board and found both stevedoring companies negligent in their duties. Hebert was also found 20% contributorily negligent. The court awarded Hebert $41,121.95 against D/S Ove Skou. D/S Ove Skou received 50% indemnity from the stevedoring companies, and United Fruit Company received indemnity for attorney's fees from the stevedoring companies.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Hebert v. D/S Ove Skou workers compensation case in District Court, E.D. Texas. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Hebert v. D/S Ove Skou case law summary from District Court, E.D. Texas. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Hebert v. D/S Ove Skou Case Analysis

Hebert v. D/S Ove Skou is a legal case related to workers' compensation in District Court, E.D. Texas. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

Hebert v. D/S Ove Skou – District Court, E.D. Texas | CompFox | CompFox