Home/Case Law/Hearn v. Ralph Sollitt & Sons Const. Co.
Regular Panel Decision DecisionRegular Panel Decision

Hearn v. Ralph Sollitt & Sons Const. Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas
MISSING

CompFox AI Summary

Plaintiff George Hearn sued Ralph Sollitt & Sons Construction Company for $516.60 in unpaid wages for work performed on a federal courthouse and post office. Hearn claimed he was paid 30 cents per hour but was entitled to $1.00 per hour for signaling, operating a concrete mixer, and structural ironwork, based on a contract between the defendant and the U.S. government that stipulated prevailing wages. The trial court directed a verdict for the defendant, ruling that parts of Hearn's claim were insufficiently pleaded, reducing the recoverable amount below jurisdictional limits. The appellate court reversed, finding the petition sufficient to establish a cause of action for structural ironwork and that the contract's wage provisions were intended to benefit laborers.

Hearn v. Ralph Sollitt & Sons Const. Co. is a workers' compensation case decided in Court of Appeals of Texas. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Court of Appeals of Texas.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Plaintiff George Hearn sued Ralph Sollitt & Sons Construction Company for $516.60 in unpaid wages for work performed on a federal courthouse and post office. Hearn claimed he was paid 30 cents per hour but was entitled to $1.00 per hour for signaling, operating a concrete mixer, and structural ironwork, based on a contract between the defendant and the U.S. government that stipulated prevailing wages. The trial court directed a verdict for the defendant, ruling that parts of Hearn's claim were insufficiently pleaded, reducing the recoverable amount below jurisdictional limits. The appellate court reversed, finding the petition sufficient to establish a cause of action for structural ironwork and that the contract's wage provisions were intended to benefit laborers.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Hearn v. Ralph Sollitt & Sons Const. Co. workers compensation case in Court of Appeals of Texas. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Hearn v. Ralph Sollitt & Sons Const. Co. case law summary from Court of Appeals of Texas. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Hearn v. Ralph Sollitt & Sons Const. Co. Case Analysis

Hearn v. Ralph Sollitt & Sons Const. Co. is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Court of Appeals of Texas. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.