CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the lien claimant's petition for reconsideration, upholding the administrative law judge's award of $7,500 for facility fees and $1,189.73 per procedure. The Board found that the lien claimant failed to meet its burden of proving its charges were reasonable, while the defendant provided persuasive evidence suggesting the billed amount was excessive. Consequently, the WCAB affirmed the WCJ's decision to rely on the defendant's evidence to determine reasonable compensation.
HAYLEY PURECE vs. CITY OF LOS ANGELES is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the lien claimant's petition for reconsideration, upholding the administrative law judge's award of $7,500 for facility fees and $1,189.73 per procedure. The Board found that the lien claimant failed to meet its burden of proving its charges were reasonable, while the defendant provided persuasive evidence suggesting the billed amount was excessive. Consequently, the WCAB affirmed the WCJ's decision to rely on the defendant's evidence to determine reasonable compensation.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.