Home/Case Law/HARRY PIFER vs. LA MESA APPLIANCE COMPANY, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND
Regular Decision

HARRY PIFER vs. LA MESA APPLIANCE COMPANY, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

Filed: Sep 12, 2014
San Francisco
ADJ4447791 (SDO 0259860)

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the petitioner's Petition for Reconsideration because it was not filed from a final order that determined substantive rights. The Board also denied removal, finding no showing of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm if removal was not granted. The petitioner failed to demonstrate that reconsideration would be an inadequate remedy. Lastly, supplemental filings were rejected as not considered.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the petitioner's Petition for Reconsideration because it was not filed from a final order that determined substantive rights. The Board also denied removal, finding no showing of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm if removal was not granted. The petitioner failed to demonstrate that reconsideration would be an inadequate remedy. Lastly, supplemental filings were rejected as not considered.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

HARRY PIFER vs. LA MESA APPLIANCE COMPANY, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND (2014) – San Francisco | CompFox