Home/Case Law/HARRY BURTOVOY vs. RELIANCE STEEL AND ALUMINUM CO., ACE AMERICAN, ADMINISTERED BY ESIS
Regular DecisionRemoval

HARRY BURTOVOY vs. RELIANCE STEEL AND ALUMINUM CO., ACE AMERICAN, ADMINISTERED BY ESIS

Filed: Feb 19, 2009
San Francisco
ADJ3126343

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied Harry Burtovoy's petition for removal in his case against Reliance Steel and Aluminum Co. and its administrator ACE AMERICAN. The Board found that removal is an extraordinary remedy and Burtovoy failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable injury if removal was not granted. Therefore, the petition for removal was denied based on the WCJ's report.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied Harry Burtovoy's petition for removal in his case against Reliance Steel and Aluminum Co. and its administrator ACE AMERICAN. The Board found that removal is an extraordinary remedy and Burtovoy failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable injury if removal was not granted. Therefore, the petition for removal was denied based on the WCJ's report.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

HARRY BURTOVOY vs. RELIANCE STEEL AND ALUMINUM CO., ACE AMERICAN, ADMINISTERED BY ESIS (2009) – San Francisco | CompFox