Home/Case Law/ HARRIET ZINGER, vs. JEFFER, MANGELS, BUTLER & MARMARO; SUPERIOR NATIONAL INSURANCE, In Liquidation; CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND,
Regular DecisionReconsideration

HARRIET ZINGER, vs. JEFFER, MANGELS, BUTLER & MARMARO; SUPERIOR NATIONAL INSURANCE, In Liquidation; CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND,

Filed: Dec 13, 2010
San Francisco
ADJ2917674 (VNO 0407939)

CompFox AI Summary

The WCAB granted the State Compensation Insurance Fund's (SCIF) petition for reconsideration. The SCIF sought to change the date of injury for applicant Harriet Zinger's orthopedic injury. While the WCJ initially set the date of injury as February 17, 2001, based on her first temporary disability, the SCIF argued for September 2, 2000. The WCAB affirmed the WCJ's decision on the date of injury and the period of liability. However, they amended the dismissal order to correctly identify Superior National Insurance, in liquidation, as a dismissed defendant.

HARRIET ZINGER, vs. JEFFER, MANGELS, BUTLER & MARMARO; SUPERIOR NATIONAL INSURANCE, In Liquidation; CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The WCAB granted the State Compensation Insurance Fund's (SCIF) petition for reconsideration. The SCIF sought to change the date of injury for applicant Harriet Zinger's orthopedic injury. While the WCJ initially set the date of injury as February 17, 2001, based on her first temporary disability, the SCIF argued for September 2, 2000. The WCAB affirmed the WCJ's decision on the date of injury and the period of liability. However, they amended the dismissal order to correctly identify Superior National Insurance, in liquidation, as a dismissed defendant.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

HARRIET ZINGER, vs. JEFFER, MANGELS, BUTLER & MARMARO; SUPERIOR NATIONAL INSURANCE, In Liquidation; CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

HARRIET ZINGER, vs. JEFFER, MANGELS, BUTLER & MARMARO; SUPERIOR NATIONAL INSURANCE, In Liquidation; CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

HARRIET ZINGER, vs. JEFFER, MANGELS, BUTLER & MARMARO; SUPERIOR NATIONAL INSURANCE, In Liquidation; CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, Case Analysis

HARRIET ZINGER, vs. JEFFER, MANGELS, BUTLER & MARMARO; SUPERIOR NATIONAL INSURANCE, In Liquidation; CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.