Home/Case Law/GUSTAVO RUBALCAVA vs. AMERJIT GILL AND COAST XPRESS AKA COAST XPRESS, INC.
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

GUSTAVO RUBALCAVA vs. AMERJIT GILL AND COAST XPRESS AKA COAST XPRESS, INC.

Filed: Feb 11, 2019
Fresno
ADJ9770975

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied a petition for reconsideration in the case of Rubalcava v. Gill and Coast Xpress. The WCAB adopted the reasoning of the workers' compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) and found no substantial evidence to overturn the WCJ's credibility determinations. The WCAB gave significant weight to the WCJ's opportunity to observe witness demeanor. Therefore, the petition for reconsideration was denied.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied a petition for reconsideration in the case of Rubalcava v. Gill and Coast Xpress. The WCAB adopted the reasoning of the workers' compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) and found no substantial evidence to overturn the WCJ's credibility determinations. The WCAB gave significant weight to the WCJ's opportunity to observe witness demeanor. Therefore, the petition for reconsideration was denied.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.