CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of a finding of 79% permanent disability. The Board found the applicant's vocational expert's opinions regarding diminished future earning capacity unsubstantiated. Consequently, the Board amended the award to reflect 37% permanent disability based on a prior stipulation, and removed any apportionment to non-industrial factors due to lack of substantial medical evidence from the defendant.
GUILLERMO HERNANDEZ vs. SPIESS CONSTRUCTION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in Goleta. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Goleta.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of a finding of 79% permanent disability. The Board found the applicant's vocational expert's opinions regarding diminished future earning capacity unsubstantiated. Consequently, the Board amended the award to reflect 37% permanent disability based on a prior stipulation, and removed any apportionment to non-industrial factors due to lack of substantial medical evidence from the defendant.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.