CompFox AI Summary
This case involves defendant State Compensation Insurance Fund's petition for reconsideration of a Findings and Award. The administrative law judge (WCJ) previously stipulated applicant sustained permanent disability of 37% with no apportionment, reserving jurisdiction on the applicability of the Ogilvie decision. The defendant argues the WCJ erred by reserving jurisdiction and rejecting the Agreed Medical Examiner's apportionment. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration and removal to address these contentions, while deferring final decisions on permanent disability, apportionment, and attorney fees.
GUILLERMO HERNANDEZ vs. SPIESS CONSTRUCTION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case involves defendant State Compensation Insurance Fund's petition for reconsideration of a Findings and Award. The administrative law judge (WCJ) previously stipulated applicant sustained permanent disability of 37% with no apportionment, reserving jurisdiction on the applicability of the Ogilvie decision. The defendant argues the WCJ erred by reserving jurisdiction and rejecting the Agreed Medical Examiner's apportionment. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration and removal to address these contentions, while deferring final decisions on permanent disability, apportionment, and attorney fees.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.