CompFox AI Summary
This case concerns a caregiver, Guadalupe Valenzuela, who sustained industrial injuries while working for Altruist Homecare Services. Altruist sought to have Valenzuela classified as an independent contractor, arguing that Civil Code section 1812.5095 applied and exempted them from employer liability. However, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Altruist's petition, upholding the finding that Valenzuela was an employee. The Board found Altruist failed to meet all the statutory requirements for independent contractor status under the Civil Code and that Valenzuela's circumstances indicated an employer-employee relationship under the Borello factors. Specifically, Valenzuela's inability to freely renegotiate pay and her belief that Altruist could terminate her employment were critical to the decision.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case concerns a caregiver, Guadalupe Valenzuela, who sustained industrial injuries while working for Altruist Homecare Services. Altruist sought to have Valenzuela classified as an independent contractor, arguing that Civil Code section 1812.5095 applied and exempted them from employer liability. However, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Altruist's petition, upholding the finding that Valenzuela was an employee. The Board found Altruist failed to meet all the statutory requirements for independent contractor status under the Civil Code and that Valenzuela's circumstances indicated an employer-employee relationship under the Borello factors. Specifically, Valenzuela's inability to freely renegotiate pay and her belief that Altruist could terminate her employment were critical to the decision.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.