Home/Case Law/GUADALUPE MUNOZ vs. PRONTO MARKET, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND
Regular Decision

GUADALUPE MUNOZ vs. PRONTO MARKET, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

Filed: Jul 25, 2014
San Francisco
ADJ2336207

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves a dismissed petition for reconsideration by a lien claimant. The petition was dismissed because it was unverified and not properly served on the defendant. Furthermore, the petition failed to state valid grounds for reconsideration. The Appeals Board also noted that the petition was not brought to their attention within the statutory 60-day period, but due process allowed for the tolling of this period.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves a dismissed petition for reconsideration by a lien claimant. The petition was dismissed because it was unverified and not properly served on the defendant. Furthermore, the petition failed to state valid grounds for reconsideration. The Appeals Board also noted that the petition was not brought to their attention within the statutory 60-day period, but due process allowed for the tolling of this period.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

GUADALUPE MUNOZ vs. PRONTO MARKET, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND (2014) – San Francisco | CompFox