Home/Case Law/Greenwich Life Settlements, Inc. v. Viasource Funding Group, LLC
Regular Panel Decision DecisionDiversity Action

Greenwich Life Settlements, Inc. v. Viasource Funding Group, LLC

District Court, S.D. New York
MISSING

CompFox AI Summary

This is a diversity action for breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, tortious interference with contract, tortious interference with business relations, and unjust enrichment. Plaintiffs Greenwich Life Settlements, Inc. and Greenwich Settlements Master Trust (collectively Greenwich) bring this action against defendant ViaSource Funding Group, LLC. Greenwich claims to be a third-party beneficiary to a life insurance contract purchased from ViaSource by non-party Legacy Benefits Corp. ViaSource moved to dismiss Greenwich’s Corrected Amended Complaint on grounds of res judicata and failure to join an indispensable party, or alternatively, to transfer the case to the District of New Jersey. The court denied all of ViaSource’s motions, finding that res judicata did not apply as Greenwich was not in privity with Legacy in prior litigations, Legacy was not an indispensable party, and venue was proper in the Southern District of New York.

Greenwich Life Settlements, Inc. v. Viasource Funding Group, LLC is a workers' compensation case decided in District Court, S.D. New York. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in District Court, S.D. New York.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This is a diversity action for breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, tortious interference with contract, tortious interference with business relations, and unjust enrichment. Plaintiffs Greenwich Life Settlements, Inc. and Greenwich Settlements Master Trust (collectively "Greenwich") bring this action against defendant ViaSource Funding Group, LLC. Greenwich claims to be a third-party beneficiary to a life insurance contract purchased from ViaSource by non-party Legacy Benefits Corp. ViaSource moved to dismiss Greenwich’s Corrected Amended Complaint on grounds of res judicata and failure to join an indispensable party, or alternatively, to transfer the case to the District of New Jersey. The court denied all of ViaSource’s motions, finding that res judicata did not apply as Greenwich was not in privity with Legacy in prior litigations, Legacy was not an indispensable party, and venue was proper in the Southern District of New York.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Greenwich Life Settlements, Inc. v. Viasource Funding Group, LLC workers compensation case in District Court, S.D. New York. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Greenwich Life Settlements, Inc. v. Viasource Funding Group, LLC case law summary from District Court, S.D. New York. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Greenwich Life Settlements, Inc. v. Viasource Funding Group, LLC Case Analysis

Greenwich Life Settlements, Inc. v. Viasource Funding Group, LLC is a legal case related to workers' compensation in District Court, S.D. New York. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.