Home/Case Law/GRACIELA CASTRO vs. SHADE HOTEL, FARMERS INSURANCE
Regular Decision

GRACIELA CASTRO vs. SHADE HOTEL, FARMERS INSURANCE

Filed: Sep 13, 2013
Los Angeles
ADJ6471197, ADJ6471198

CompFox AI Summary

This case was dismissed because the Applicant's Petition for Reconsideration was based on an interlocutory order, not a final decision on substantive rights or liabilities. The Board clarified that reconsideration is only permitted for final orders under Labor Code section 5900. As there was no order dismissing the Applicant's lien, the Applicant was not aggrieved by a final decision. Therefore, the Petition for Reconsideration was dismissed.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case was dismissed because the Applicant's Petition for Reconsideration was based on an interlocutory order, not a final decision on substantive rights or liabilities. The Board clarified that reconsideration is only permitted for final orders under Labor Code section 5900. As there was no order dismissing the Applicant's lien, the Applicant was not aggrieved by a final decision. Therefore, the Petition for Reconsideration was dismissed.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

GRACIELA CASTRO vs. SHADE HOTEL, FARMERS INSURANCE (2013) – Los Angeles | CompFox