CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of a prior ruling finding no industrial injury AOE/COE. The applicant's testimony regarding a shoulder and psyche injury on April 5, 2011, was found not credible due to inconsistencies with medical records and photographic evidence of subsequent work. The Board also affirmed the finding that the claim was time-barred, as the application was filed over two years after the alleged injury date. The WCJ's credibility determinations, supported by substantial evidence, were upheld.
GONZALO DAZA vs. SIGNATURE SERVICES/NEWPORT FEDERAL, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in Anaheim. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Anaheim.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of a prior ruling finding no industrial injury AOE/COE. The applicant's testimony regarding a shoulder and psyche injury on April 5, 2011, was found not credible due to inconsistencies with medical records and photographic evidence of subsequent work. The Board also affirmed the finding that the claim was time-barred, as the application was filed over two years after the alleged injury date. The WCJ's credibility determinations, supported by substantial evidence, were upheld.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.