Home/Case Law/GLORIA DE MELLO DREW vs. BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA, SENTRY CLAIMS SERVICE, AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA/CNA CLAIMPLUS, INC.
Regular DecisionReconsideration

GLORIA DE MELLO DREW vs. BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA, SENTRY CLAIMS SERVICE, AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA/CNA CLAIMPLUS, INC.

Filed: Dec 28, 2007
San Francisco
SFO 0470324, SFO 0480936, SFO 0482017

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the Arbitrator's decision, and returned the case for further proceedings. This action was taken because the Arbitrator failed to issue a decision within the statutory 30-day period after submission, as required by Labor Code section 5722, and the arbitration record lacked sufficient documentation. The Board found that the defendant did not waive this procedural defect by waiting to raise it until after the decision was issued.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the Arbitrator's decision, and returned the case for further proceedings. This action was taken because the Arbitrator failed to issue a decision within the statutory 30-day period after submission, as required by Labor Code section 5722, and the arbitration record lacked sufficient documentation. The Board found that the defendant did not waive this procedural defect by waiting to raise it until after the decision was issued.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

GLORIA DE MELLO DREW vs. BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA, SENTRY CLAIMS SERVICE, AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA/CNA CLAIMPLUS, INC. (2007) – San Francisco | CompFox