CompFox AI Summary
The Appeals Board affirmed the WCJ's denial of retroactive VRMA, finding that merely listing vocational rehabilitation as an issue in applications did not establish a good faith demand for services. However, the Board rescinded the denial of attorney's fees under LC 5814.5, remanding the issue for further determination in light of the en banc decision in Ramirez v. Drive Financial Services. This ruling clarifies that LC 5814.5 applies to delays occurring after January 1, 2003, regardless of the injury date.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Appeals Board affirmed the WCJ's denial of retroactive VRMA, finding that merely listing vocational rehabilitation as an issue in applications did not establish a good faith demand for services. However, the Board rescinded the denial of attorney's fees under LC 5814.5, remanding the issue for further determination in light of the en banc decision in Ramirez v. Drive Financial Services. This ruling clarifies that LC 5814.5 applies to delays occurring after January 1, 2003, regardless of the injury date.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.