Home/Case Law/GLORIA BENITEZ vs. NEWPORT SUBACUTE HEALTH CARE CENTER, ALASKA NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Regular DecisionReconsideration

GLORIA BENITEZ vs. NEWPORT SUBACUTE HEALTH CARE CENTER, ALASKA NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY

Filed: Oct 03, 2016
Anaheim
ADJ7288330

CompFox AI Summary

The applicant, Gloria Benitez, sought to reopen her workers' compensation claim to include injury to additional body parts beyond her cervical spine and psyche. The original award found injury only to the cervical spine and psyche, with a 19% permanent disability rating for the cervical spine. While the WCJ's initial decision denied injury to additional body parts, the Board granted reconsideration. The Board amended the original findings to defer the issue of injury to the alleged additional body parts, while affirming other aspects of the WCJ's order, including the appointment of a regular physician to evaluate new and further disability.

GLORIA BENITEZ vs. NEWPORT SUBACUTE HEALTH CARE CENTER, ALASKA NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY is a workers' compensation case decided in Anaheim. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Anaheim.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The applicant, Gloria Benitez, sought to reopen her workers' compensation claim to include injury to additional body parts beyond her cervical spine and psyche. The original award found injury only to the cervical spine and psyche, with a 19% permanent disability rating for the cervical spine. While the WCJ's initial decision denied injury to additional body parts, the Board granted reconsideration. The Board amended the original findings to defer the issue of injury to the alleged additional body parts, while affirming other aspects of the WCJ's order, including the appointment of a regular physician to evaluate new and further disability.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

GLORIA BENITEZ vs. NEWPORT SUBACUTE HEALTH CARE CENTER, ALASKA NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY workers compensation case in Anaheim. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

GLORIA BENITEZ vs. NEWPORT SUBACUTE HEALTH CARE CENTER, ALASKA NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY case law summary from Anaheim. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

GLORIA BENITEZ vs. NEWPORT SUBACUTE HEALTH CARE CENTER, ALASKA NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY Case Analysis

GLORIA BENITEZ vs. NEWPORT SUBACUTE HEALTH CARE CENTER, ALASKA NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Anaheim. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.