CompFox AI Summary
Plaintiff Globe Stevedoring Company, Inc. sought a temporary injunction to prevent the enforcement of a workers' compensation award. The award, issued by a deputy commissioner, held Globe Stevedoring and Lumbermen's Reciprocal Insurance Association liable to J. E. Peters, an employee injured while loading the steamship Abereos. Globe Stevedoring argued it was not liable as a subcontractor under the Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, citing an agreement where the vessel owner was to provide insurance coverage. Additionally, the plaintiff claimed a denial of due process due to lack of notice and opportunity to present defenses before the deputy commissioner. The court denied the application for a temporary injunction, finding that the plaintiff's interpretation of the Act regarding subcontractor liability was incorrect. Furthermore, the court determined that the plaintiff's allegations of insufficient notice and lack of due process were not specific or direct enough to overcome statutory presumptions and the findings of the deputy commissioner, especially given the plaintiff's failure to pursue available remedies under the Compensation Act.
Globe Stevedoring Co. v. Peters is a workers' compensation case decided in District Court, S.D. Texas. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in District Court, S.D. Texas.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
Plaintiff Globe Stevedoring Company, Inc. sought a temporary injunction to prevent the enforcement of a workers' compensation award. The award, issued by a deputy commissioner, held Globe Stevedoring and Lumbermen's Reciprocal Insurance Association liable to J. E. Peters, an employee injured while loading the steamship Abereos. Globe Stevedoring argued it was not liable as a subcontractor under the Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, citing an agreement where the vessel owner was to provide insurance coverage. Additionally, the plaintiff claimed a denial of due process due to lack of notice and opportunity to present defenses before the deputy commissioner. The court denied the application for a temporary injunction, finding that the plaintiff's interpretation of the Act regarding subcontractor liability was incorrect. Furthermore, the court determined that the plaintiff's allegations of insufficient notice and lack of due process were not specific or direct enough to overcome statutory presumptions and the findings of the deputy commissioner, especially given the plaintiff's failure to pursue available remedies under the Compensation Act.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.