Home/Case Law/GILBERTO ROMAGNOLO vs. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; OLD REPUBLIC as administered by BROADSPIRE
Regular DecisionReconsideration/Removal

GILBERTO ROMAGNOLO vs. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; OLD REPUBLIC as administered by BROADSPIRE

Filed: Nov 08, 2019
Van Nuys
ADJ11536236

CompFox AI Summary

Defendant Uber Technologies sought reconsideration or removal of an order denying their petition to dismiss applicant Romagnolo's workers' compensation claim based on res judicata. The Appeals Board dismissed the reconsideration petition, finding the order non-final and interlocutory. The Board also denied the removal petition, deeming it an extraordinary remedy not warranted by alleged prejudice. The Board admonished Uber and its counsel for pursuing a frivolous litigation strategy, noting a similar prior dismissal.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Defendant Uber Technologies sought reconsideration or removal of an order denying their petition to dismiss applicant Romagnolo's workers' compensation claim based on res judicata. The Appeals Board dismissed the reconsideration petition, finding the order non-final and interlocutory. The Board also denied the removal petition, deeming it an extraordinary remedy not warranted by alleged prejudice. The Board admonished Uber and its counsel for pursuing a frivolous litigation strategy, noting a similar prior dismissal.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

GILBERTO ROMAGNOLO vs. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; OLD REPUBLIC as administered by BROADSPIRE (2019) – Van Nuys | CompFox