CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and rescinded the original Findings and Award. The Board found that the WCJ erred by not properly apportioning permanent disability between two claimed industrial injuries and non-industrial factors. Specifically, the Board requires clarification on how psychiatric and erectile dysfunction disability were apportioned and whether all body part injuries were medically substantiated. The case is returned to the trial level for further proceedings to address these deficiencies and ensure a record supports a final determination.
GERARDO NAVARRO vs. LAW OFFICES OF MOISES VASQUEZ, THE HARTFORD is a workers' compensation case decided in San Bernardino. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Bernardino.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and rescinded the original Findings and Award. The Board found that the WCJ erred by not properly apportioning permanent disability between two claimed industrial injuries and non-industrial factors. Specifically, the Board requires clarification on how psychiatric and erectile dysfunction disability were apportioned and whether all body part injuries were medically substantiated. The case is returned to the trial level for further proceedings to address these deficiencies and ensure a record supports a final determination.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.