Home/Case Law/GERALDINE PEREYRA vs. SAGE HUMPHRIES, D.D.S., STATE FARM INSURANCE
Regular DecisionReconsideration

GERALDINE PEREYRA vs. SAGE HUMPHRIES, D.D.S., STATE FARM INSURANCE

Filed: Nov 30, 2018
Pomona
ADJ10721346 ADJ10568270

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's petition for reconsideration. The applicant alleged injury from carrying a sterilization machine, but the administrative law judge found her testimony not credible, particularly after hearing conflicting testimony from Dr. Do. The Board deferred to the judge's credibility determination due to his opportunity to observe the witnesses. Therefore, the applicant failed to prove her injury arose out of and in the course of employment.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's petition for reconsideration. The applicant alleged injury from carrying a sterilization machine, but the administrative law judge found her testimony not credible, particularly after hearing conflicting testimony from Dr. Do. The Board deferred to the judge's credibility determination due to his opportunity to observe the witnesses. Therefore, the applicant failed to prove her injury arose out of and in the course of employment.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

GERALDINE PEREYRA vs. SAGE HUMPHRIES, D.D.S., STATE FARM INSURANCE (2018) – Pomona | CompFox