Home/Case Law/GEORGINA HENSON vs. TRA PAC, U.S. FIDELITY AND GUARANTEE INSURANCE COMPANY
Regular DecisionReconsideration

GEORGINA HENSON vs. TRA PAC, U.S. FIDELITY AND GUARANTEE INSURANCE COMPANY

Filed: Jan 05, 2009
San Francisco
ADJ1482040 (SFO 508301)

CompFox AI Summary

The Appeals Board denied applicant's petition and granted defendant's petition to dismiss Signal Mutual Insurance Company and identify U.S. Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company as the insurer.

GEORGINA HENSON vs. TRA PAC, U.S. FIDELITY AND GUARANTEE INSURANCE COMPANY is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Appeals Board denied applicant's petition and granted defendant's petition to dismiss Signal Mutual Insurance Company and identify U.S. Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company as the insurer.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

GEORGINA HENSON vs. TRA PAC, U.S. FIDELITY AND GUARANTEE INSURANCE COMPANY workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

GEORGINA HENSON vs. TRA PAC, U.S. FIDELITY AND GUARANTEE INSURANCE COMPANY case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

GEORGINA HENSON vs. TRA PAC, U.S. FIDELITY AND GUARANTEE INSURANCE COMPANY Case Analysis

GEORGINA HENSON vs. TRA PAC, U.S. FIDELITY AND GUARANTEE INSURANCE COMPANY is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.