Home/Case Law/GEORGE VELASQUEZ vs. RALPHS, Permissibly Self-Insured
Regular DecisionDecision After Remittitur

GEORGE VELASQUEZ vs. RALPHS, Permissibly Self-Insured

Filed: Sep 06, 2012
Pomona
ADJ721289 (POM 0278079) ADJ820025 (LBO 0312141) ADJ1988208 (POM 0278080) ADJ6759922

CompFox AI Summary

The Court of Appeal ruled that Ralphs' initial appeal of vocational rehabilitation benefits was timely despite lacking a Declaration of Readiness. However, the applicant's vocational rehabilitation award was not final before Labor Code section 139.5 was repealed on January 1, 2009. Consequently, the applicant's right to these benefits expired, and the Appeals Board lost jurisdiction. The Appeals Board rescinded the prior award and ordered that the applicant take nothing for vocational rehabilitation benefits.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Court of Appeal ruled that Ralphs' initial appeal of vocational rehabilitation benefits was timely despite lacking a Declaration of Readiness. However, the applicant's vocational rehabilitation award was not final before Labor Code section 139.5 was repealed on January 1, 2009. Consequently, the applicant's right to these benefits expired, and the Appeals Board lost jurisdiction. The Appeals Board rescinded the prior award and ordered that the applicant take nothing for vocational rehabilitation benefits.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

GEORGE VELASQUEZ vs. RALPHS, Permissibly Self-Insured (2012) – Pomona | CompFox