Home/Case Law/GEORGE SCHOPPLEIN vs. TENNYSON ELECTRIC, PACIFIC COMPENSATION
Regular Decision

GEORGE SCHOPPLEIN vs. TENNYSON ELECTRIC, PACIFIC COMPENSATION

Filed: Dec 11, 2010
San Francisco
ADJ7047418

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed an applicant's petition for removal because it was not verified as required by WCAB Rule 10843(b). The applicant sought to reverse a judge's finding that he needed further medical treatment within the defendant's Medical Provider Network (MPN). The applicant argued that the defendant failed to provide required notices under the Labor Code, regulations, and the Knight decision. Even if considered on its merits, the WCAB indicated it would have denied the petition, adopting the judge's reasoning.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed an applicant's petition for removal because it was not verified as required by WCAB Rule 10843(b). The applicant sought to reverse a judge's finding that he needed further medical treatment within the defendant's Medical Provider Network (MPN). The applicant argued that the defendant failed to provide required notices under the Labor Code, regulations, and the Knight decision. Even if considered on its merits, the WCAB indicated it would have denied the petition, adopting the judge's reasoning.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

GEORGE SCHOPPLEIN vs. TENNYSON ELECTRIC, PACIFIC COMPENSATION (2010) – San Francisco | CompFox