Home/Case Law/GEORGE DIAZ vs. REYES MASONRY CONTRACTORS, INC., CITATION INSURANCE COMPANY, GENERAL REINSURANCE, INTERCARE, SUBSEQUENT INJURIES BENEFITS TRUST FUND
Regular DecisionReconsideration

GEORGE DIAZ vs. REYES MASONRY CONTRACTORS, INC., CITATION INSURANCE COMPANY, GENERAL REINSURANCE, INTERCARE, SUBSEQUENT INJURIES BENEFITS TRUST FUND

Filed: May 23, 2019
Oxnard
ADJ1797870

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied George Diaz's petition for reconsideration, affirming the administrative law judge's award of 93.75% permanent disability. The judge apportioned 30% of Diaz's orthopedic disability to prior injuries, relying on medical evidence of degenerative changes aggravated by the 1992 industrial injury. Diaz's arguments for 100% permanent disability due to total disability or loss of use of both hands were rejected due to insufficient medical evidence. The Board found the apportionment was supported by substantial medical evidence and did not qualify for an unapportioned award under the Hikida precedent.

GEORGE DIAZ vs. REYES MASONRY CONTRACTORS, INC., CITATION INSURANCE COMPANY, GENERAL REINSURANCE, INTERCARE, SUBSEQUENT INJURIES BENEFITS TRUST FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in Oxnard. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Oxnard.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied George Diaz's petition for reconsideration, affirming the administrative law judge's award of 93.75% permanent disability. The judge apportioned 30% of Diaz's orthopedic disability to prior injuries, relying on medical evidence of degenerative changes aggravated by the 1992 industrial injury. Diaz's arguments for 100% permanent disability due to total disability or loss of use of both hands were rejected due to insufficient medical evidence. The Board found the apportionment was supported by substantial medical evidence and did not qualify for an unapportioned award under the Hikida precedent.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

GEORGE DIAZ vs. REYES MASONRY CONTRACTORS, INC., CITATION INSURANCE COMPANY, GENERAL REINSURANCE, INTERCARE, SUBSEQUENT INJURIES BENEFITS TRUST FUND workers compensation case in Oxnard. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

GEORGE DIAZ vs. REYES MASONRY CONTRACTORS, INC., CITATION INSURANCE COMPANY, GENERAL REINSURANCE, INTERCARE, SUBSEQUENT INJURIES BENEFITS TRUST FUND case law summary from Oxnard. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

GEORGE DIAZ vs. REYES MASONRY CONTRACTORS, INC., CITATION INSURANCE COMPANY, GENERAL REINSURANCE, INTERCARE, SUBSEQUENT INJURIES BENEFITS TRUST FUND Case Analysis

GEORGE DIAZ vs. REYES MASONRY CONTRACTORS, INC., CITATION INSURANCE COMPANY, GENERAL REINSURANCE, INTERCARE, SUBSEQUENT INJURIES BENEFITS TRUST FUND is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Oxnard. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.