CompFox AI Summary
The applicant sought reconsideration of an order approving a stipulation for $$6,510.00$ in medical expense reimbursement, alleging his attorney mistakenly agreed to the lower amount instead of $$13,020.00$. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the original order, and remanded the case. The WCJ must now determine if there is good cause to set aside the stipulation based on the alleged mistake. If not, the stipulation will be reinstated.
GEORGE ABOUD vs. HARTSON MEDICAL SERVICES, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The applicant sought reconsideration of an order approving a stipulation for $$6,510.00$ in medical expense reimbursement, alleging his attorney mistakenly agreed to the lower amount instead of $$13,020.00$. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the original order, and remanded the case. The WCJ must now determine if there is good cause to set aside the stipulation based on the alleged mistake. If not, the stipulation will be reinstated.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.