Home/Case Law/GAYE MARTIN vs. LENNAR CORPORATION, BROADSPIRE
Regular DecisionRemoval Petition

GAYE MARTIN vs. LENNAR CORPORATION, BROADSPIRE

Filed: Jan 24, 2012
San Francisco
ADJ3633276 (SAC 0360146)

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the Petition for Removal filed by defendants Lennar Corporation and its third-party administrator, Broadspire. The Board adopted the WCJ's report, which recommended denial because the applicant's request to take the case off calendar was granted to allow her to develop her case under a recent Ogilvie decision. Additionally, the defendants were admonished for Broadspire's failure to disclose the identity of its client as required by Coldiron v. Compuware Corp. and were put on notice that sanctions could be considered at the trial level.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the Petition for Removal filed by defendants Lennar Corporation and its third-party administrator, Broadspire. The Board adopted the WCJ's report, which recommended denial because the applicant's request to take the case off calendar was granted to allow her to develop her case under a recent Ogilvie decision. Additionally, the defendants were admonished for Broadspire's failure to disclose the identity of its client as required by Coldiron v. Compuware Corp. and were put on notice that sanctions could be considered at the trial level.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

GAYE MARTIN vs. LENNAR CORPORATION, BROADSPIRE (2012) – San Francisco | CompFox