CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board rescinded the previous award because the administrative law judge's decision was not supported by substantial evidence regarding the date of injury and apportionment of liability. The Board found that the record needed further development, particularly by obtaining supplemental reports or depositions from the Panel Qualified Medical Evaluator. The case is returned to the trial level for further proceedings to clarify these critical issues and potentially re-evaluate the applicant's election against co-defendants.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board rescinded the previous award because the administrative law judge's decision was not supported by substantial evidence regarding the date of injury and apportionment of liability. The Board found that the record needed further development, particularly by obtaining supplemental reports or depositions from the Panel Qualified Medical Evaluator. The case is returned to the trial level for further proceedings to clarify these critical issues and potentially re-evaluate the applicant's election against co-defendants.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.