Home/Case Law/GARY STODDARD vs. NEVADA IRRIGATION DISTRICT, TRISTAR RISK MANAGEMENT, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, GOLDEN EAGLE INSURANCE
Regular DecisionReconsideration

GARY STODDARD vs. NEVADA IRRIGATION DISTRICT, TRISTAR RISK MANAGEMENT, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, GOLDEN EAGLE INSURANCE

Filed: Sep 13, 2007
San Francisco
RDG 116853; RDG 116854; RDG 116855; RDG 116856; RDG 122064

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and affirmed the administrative law judge's decision, which found no employer discrimination under Labor Code § 132a. However, the Board amended the order to shift $$500$ in sanctions from the defendant employer to its defense counsel, Bradford & Barthel, for their conduct prior to and during trial. The applicant's contention of discrimination was otherwise rejected.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and affirmed the administrative law judge's decision, which found no employer discrimination under Labor Code § 132a. However, the Board amended the order to shift $$500$ in sanctions from the defendant employer to its defense counsel, Bradford & Barthel, for their conduct prior to and during trial. The applicant's contention of discrimination was otherwise rejected.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.