Home/Case Law/GARY RAUSSER vs. CONSOLIDATED PERSONNEL CORPPORATION and CIGA, CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED SERVICES GROUP, INC., LEGION INSURANCE
Regular DecisionReconsideration

GARY RAUSSER vs. CONSOLIDATED PERSONNEL CORPPORATION and CIGA, CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED SERVICES GROUP, INC., LEGION INSURANCE

Filed: Jul 21, 2008
San Francisco
SAC 339624

CompFox AI Summary

CIGA sought reconsideration and removal after the WCJ denied their request to join Benjamin Moore Paints, arguing it was a necessary defendant. However, the Board dismissed CIGA's Petition for Reconsideration, finding the order denying joinder was not a final order, and denied the Petition for Removal, as CIGA failed to demonstrate significant prejudice or irreparable harm. The Board adopted the WCJ's reasoning that Benjamin Moore was already a party defendant, making further joinder unnecessary.

GARY RAUSSER vs. CONSOLIDATED PERSONNEL CORPPORATION and CIGA, CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED SERVICES GROUP, INC., LEGION INSURANCE is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

CIGA sought reconsideration and removal after the WCJ denied their request to join Benjamin Moore Paints, arguing it was a necessary defendant. However, the Board dismissed CIGA's Petition for Reconsideration, finding the order denying joinder was not a final order, and denied the Petition for Removal, as CIGA failed to demonstrate significant prejudice or irreparable harm. The Board adopted the WCJ's reasoning that Benjamin Moore was already a party defendant, making further joinder unnecessary.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

GARY RAUSSER vs. CONSOLIDATED PERSONNEL CORPPORATION and CIGA, CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED SERVICES GROUP, INC., LEGION INSURANCE workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

GARY RAUSSER vs. CONSOLIDATED PERSONNEL CORPPORATION and CIGA, CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED SERVICES GROUP, INC., LEGION INSURANCE case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

GARY RAUSSER vs. CONSOLIDATED PERSONNEL CORPPORATION and CIGA, CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED SERVICES GROUP, INC., LEGION INSURANCE Case Analysis

GARY RAUSSER vs. CONSOLIDATED PERSONNEL CORPPORATION and CIGA, CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED SERVICES GROUP, INC., LEGION INSURANCE is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.