Home/Case Law/GARY HALL vs. COUNTY OF LAKE, Permissibly Self-Insured, administered by INTERCARE HOLDINGS INSURANCE SERVICES, INC.
Regular DecisionReconsideration

GARY HALL vs. COUNTY OF LAKE, Permissibly Self-Insured, administered by INTERCARE HOLDINGS INSURANCE SERVICES, INC.

Filed: May 20, 2015
Santa Rosa
ADJ9430358

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration, finding the applicant's claim for cumulative heart injury was not barred by the statute of limitations, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. The Board determined that previous medical opinions concluding the applicant had no heart trouble did not address the current claim of manifestation of heart trouble within the statutory presumption period for deputy sheriffs. Therefore, the case was returned to the trial level for further proceedings and a decision on the merits.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration, finding the applicant's claim for cumulative heart injury was not barred by the statute of limitations, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. The Board determined that previous medical opinions concluding the applicant had no heart trouble did not address the current claim of manifestation of heart trouble within the statutory presumption period for deputy sheriffs. Therefore, the case was returned to the trial level for further proceedings and a decision on the merits.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

GARY HALL vs. COUNTY OF LAKE, Permissibly Self-Insured, administered by INTERCARE HOLDINGS INSURANCE SERVICES, INC. (2015) – Santa Rosa | CompFox