CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of a decision awarding the applicant 47% permanent disability. The applicant's petition for removal was dismissed as reconsideration was the proper remedy for challenging the final award. The decision affirmed findings that the applicant was not a credible historian and that his claimed neurocognitive deficits were not work-related. The Board adopted the Workers' Compensation Judge's report, which found substantial evidence supported the disability rating based on conflicting medical opinions and video evidence contradicting the applicant's claimed limitations.
GARY GLASGOW vs. RAM CON CO., INC., CIGA is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of a decision awarding the applicant 47% permanent disability. The applicant's petition for removal was dismissed as reconsideration was the proper remedy for challenging the final award. The decision affirmed findings that the applicant was not a credible historian and that his claimed neurocognitive deficits were not work-related. The Board adopted the Workers' Compensation Judge's report, which found substantial evidence supported the disability rating based on conflicting medical opinions and video evidence contradicting the applicant's claimed limitations.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.