CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed Frank Lozano's Petition for Reconsideration as untimely because it was filed more than 25 days after the June 10, 2013, Order. The WCAB adopted the administrative law judge's report, which detailed the untimeliness and would have also denied the petition on the merits if it had been timely. Supplemental petitions were accepted for filing but did not alter the dismissal of the primary petition. Therefore, the WCAB ordered the Petition for Reconsideration dismissed.
FRANK LOZANO vs. GEO GROUP, INC.; SEDGWICK CLAIMS is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed Frank Lozano's Petition for Reconsideration as untimely because it was filed more than 25 days after the June 10, 2013, Order. The WCAB adopted the administrative law judge's report, which detailed the untimeliness and would have also denied the petition on the merits if it had been timely. Supplemental petitions were accepted for filing but did not alter the dismissal of the primary petition. Therefore, the WCAB ordered the Petition for Reconsideration dismissed.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.