CompFox AI Summary
This case concerns a police officer injured in the line of duty, who sought further temporary disability benefits beyond the 104 weeks already paid. The applicant argued that Injured on Duty pay should not count towards the statutory limit, and that an exception for high-velocity eye injuries should apply. The Board denied reconsideration, holding that Injured on Duty pay is included within the 104-week limit under Labor Code section 4656, citing precedent, and found no evidence of a high-velocity eye injury.
FRANCK PETER vs. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; TPA: CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED SERVICES is a workers' compensation case decided in . This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in .
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case concerns a police officer injured in the line of duty, who sought further temporary disability benefits beyond the 104 weeks already paid. The applicant argued that "Injured on Duty" pay should not count towards the statutory limit, and that an exception for high-velocity eye injuries should apply. The Board denied reconsideration, holding that "Injured on Duty" pay is included within the 104-week limit under Labor Code section 4656, citing precedent, and found no evidence of a high-velocity eye injury.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.