Home/Case Law/FRANCISCO SCHICK vs. TARGET STORES, SEDGWICK
Regular DecisionReconsideration

FRANCISCO SCHICK vs. TARGET STORES, SEDGWICK

Filed: Sep 24, 2012
Long Beach
ADJ6996436

CompFox AI Summary

Lien claimant Advance Care Specialist filed a petition for reconsideration without identifying any specific order being challenged. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the petition because reconsideration is only permissible for final orders, and the WCJ's notice of intent to impose sanctions was not a final determination. The Board also noted the petition's failure to comply with procedural rules, including proper identification of the petitioner and formatting. The matter was returned to the trial level for further consideration of sanctions.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Lien claimant Advance Care Specialist filed a petition for reconsideration without identifying any specific order being challenged. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the petition because reconsideration is only permissible for final orders, and the WCJ's notice of intent to impose sanctions was not a final determination. The Board also noted the petition's failure to comply with procedural rules, including proper identification of the petitioner and formatting. The matter was returned to the trial level for further consideration of sanctions.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

FRANCISCO SCHICK vs. TARGET STORES, SEDGWICK (2012) – Long Beach | CompFox