Home/Case Law/FRANCISCO JIMENEZ vs. AG EXPRESS TRANSPORTATION, APPLIED RISK OMAHA
Regular DecisionWorkers' Compensation

FRANCISCO JIMENEZ vs. AG EXPRESS TRANSPORTATION, APPLIED RISK OMAHA

Filed: Sep 29, 2017
Los Angeles
ADJ10369716, ADJ9273910

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns the division of a $24,000 attorney's fee between two attorneys representing the applicant. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the petition for reconsideration filed by attorney Alan Tajer, who argued for a larger share of the fee. The Board found that the WCJ did not abuse her discretion in awarding $18,000 to Ronald Ehrman and $6,000 to Tajer, considering Ehrman's role in initiating the case, negotiating the settlement, and his representation for a longer period. The Board also found that the alleged error in failing to rule on the admissibility of an exhibit was harmless.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns the division of a $24,000 attorney's fee between two attorneys representing the applicant. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the petition for reconsideration filed by attorney Alan Tajer, who argued for a larger share of the fee. The Board found that the WCJ did not abuse her discretion in awarding $18,000 to Ronald Ehrman and $6,000 to Tajer, considering Ehrman's role in initiating the case, negotiating the settlement, and his representation for a longer period. The Board also found that the alleged error in failing to rule on the admissibility of an exhibit was harmless.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

FRANCISCO JIMENEZ vs. AG EXPRESS TRANSPORTATION, APPLIED RISK OMAHA (2017) – Los Angeles | CompFox