Home/Case Law/FLAVIO AMEZCUA-NAVARRO vs. GRISWOLD INDUSTRIES, ARROWPOINT CAPITAL CORPORATION, ROYAL & SUNALLIANCE, DYNAMIC CLAIMS SERVICES
Regular DecisionReconsideration

FLAVIO AMEZCUA-NAVARRO vs. GRISWOLD INDUSTRIES, ARROWPOINT CAPITAL CORPORATION, ROYAL & SUNALLIANCE, DYNAMIC CLAIMS SERVICES

Filed: Jun 02, 2008
ANA 0341847

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns a dispute over the amount of credit an employer is entitled to for permanent disability advances against a $70,000 settlement. The applicant argues that the compromise and release agreement limits the credit to $19,180, while the defendant deducted $35,049.36. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, finding that the WCJ erred in interpreting the agreement based on her subjective understanding rather than the explicit terms. The case is returned to the trial level to determine the parties' agreed-upon credit amount based on the contract language.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns a dispute over the amount of credit an employer is entitled to for permanent disability advances against a $70,000 settlement. The applicant argues that the compromise and release agreement limits the credit to $19,180, while the defendant deducted $35,049.36. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, finding that the WCJ erred in interpreting the agreement based on her subjective understanding rather than the explicit terms. The case is returned to the trial level to determine the parties' agreed-upon credit amount based on the contract language.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

FLAVIO AMEZCUA-NAVARRO vs. GRISWOLD INDUSTRIES, ARROWPOINT CAPITAL CORPORATION, ROYAL & SUNALLIANCE, DYNAMIC CLAIMS SERVICES (2008) – | CompFox