Home/Case Law/FILIBERTO SANTOYO vs. FIESTA FOOD WAREHOUSE, SPRINGFIELD INSURANCE CO.
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

FILIBERTO SANTOYO vs. FIESTA FOOD WAREHOUSE, SPRINGFIELD INSURANCE CO.

Filed: Nov 17, 2010
ADJ2956078

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's petition for removal, finding that the applicant misrepresented material evidence in the petition. The applicant had argued the trial judge issued an order without allowing a response, thus violating due process. However, the Board found inconsistencies between the applicant's claims regarding medical reports and the actual contents of those reports. The case is returned to the trial level for proceedings consistent with the opinion.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's petition for removal, finding that the applicant misrepresented material evidence in the petition. The applicant had argued the trial judge issued an order without allowing a response, thus violating due process. However, the Board found inconsistencies between the applicant's claims regarding medical reports and the actual contents of those reports. The case is returned to the trial level for proceedings consistent with the opinion.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

FILIBERTO SANTOYO vs. FIESTA FOOD WAREHOUSE, SPRINGFIELD INSURANCE CO. (2010) – | CompFox